jumpman5678 1 Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 I have been on some of their fan pages, they are getting freaked out. I don't know if it's because of the tweets or not. I believe people realized that was a twitter account of an opposing team's fan. The account was just opened recently, and immediately started going after him. To be honest, it was probably an ND fan, which is embarrassing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donjuan 16 Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 I believe people realized that was a twitter account of an opposing team's fan. The account was just opened recently, and immediately started going after him. To be honest, it was probably an ND fan, which is embarrassing. Nobody knows who it is other than the alleged OU front. Probably can save yourself from being embarrassed by a trolling faceless twitter account. You want to be embarrassed? Go check out the ND MBB score against Miami on national TV... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PJacksonsDred15 110 Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Caleb Kelly basically said he preferred playing for Mike Stoops than BVG. Thats what I got out of his post commitment comments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gatsby 0 Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Caleb Kelly basically said he preferred playing for Mike Stoops than BVG. Thats what I got out of his post commitment comments. He has cost us on and off the field. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yikityyakirish 0 Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Caleb Kelly basically said he preferred playing for Mike Stoops than BVG. Thats what I got out of his post commitment comments. Don't blame him one bit honestly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gatsby 0 Posted February 8, 2016 Share Posted February 8, 2016 I just saw an article and interview where Caleb Kelly said he put both our names in a hat and picked it. That's not the story he told on signing day, but if remotely true then we dodged a bullet. You don't leave major decisions like that up to chance. You gather data and make informed choices based on your personal motivating factors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlakeJ 0 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 Its pretty obvious at this point that Notre Dame is not Robertson's #1 choice....or maybe even #2. If Notre Dame was the place....he wouldn't be "waiting" to get his SAT back to pass admission into Stanford....and waiting for UGA coaches to be ready for him for a visit. In other words............ He gone! Which makes this recruiting class well below admirable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottawand 0 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 Its pretty obvious at this point that Notre Dame is not Robertson's #1 choice....or maybe even #2. If Notre Dame was the place....he wouldn't be "waiting" to get his SAT back to pass admission into Stanford....and waiting for UGA coaches to be ready for him for a visit. In other words............ He gone! Which makes this recruiting class well below admirable. There is nothing obvious at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtl_irish03 0 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 Its pretty obvious at this point that Notre Dame is not Robertson's #1 choice....or maybe even #2. If Notre Dame was the place....he wouldn't be "waiting" to get his SAT back to pass admission into Stanford....and waiting for UGA coaches to be ready for him for a visit. In other words............ He gone! Which makes this recruiting class well below admirable. It's an excellent class regardless. The rest I also disagree with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dangeruss 6 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 have you guys seen this yet? caleb Kelly admits that he choose OU over ND because he literally picked them out of a hat. wow, a 40 year decision based on a blind pick. http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/ncaafb/oklahoma-lb-signee-caleb-kelly-picked-sooners-out-of-a-hat-literally/ar-BBpj1ns?li=BBnba9I Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtl_irish03 0 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 have you guys seen this yet? caleb Kelly admits that he choose OU over ND because he literally picked them out of a hat. wow, a 40 year decision based on a blind pick. http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/ncaafb/oklahoma-lb-signee-caleb-kelly-picked-sooners-out-of-a-hat-literally/ar-BBpj1ns?li=BBnba9I It's a nice story I guess, but he wanted OU. Had he picked ND, he woulda just re-picked... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NDhoosier 1,264 Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Its pretty obvious at this point that Notre Dame is not Robertson's #1 choice....or maybe even #2. If Notre Dame was the place....he wouldn't be "waiting" to get his SAT back to pass admission into Stanford....and waiting for UGA coaches to be ready for him for a visit. In other words............ He gone! Which makes this recruiting class well below admirable. well below admirable? lol... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlakeJ 0 Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 well below admirable? lol... By championship standards yes. Well below. What...it was ranked 15th or something like that. I'm comparing it to Bama, Florida State and Ohio State....teams that have been perennial championship contenders.....not the likes of A&M, Penn State or Miami. Very disappointing class. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irishwavend 587 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 By championship standards yes. Well below. What...it was ranked 15th or something like that. I'm comparing it to Bama, Florida State and Ohio State....teams that have been perennial championship contenders.....not the likes of A&M, Penn State or Miami. Very disappointing class. What were Boise State and TCU's classes ranked when they were perennial contenders? What about Stanford and Oregon? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ELDER06 248 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 It's an excellent class regardless. The rest I also disagree with. I wouldn't call it "excellent," pretty good. The last "excellent" class was the class of '13. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LasVegasIrish 0 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I usually try to wait at least 2 years before I truly judge a class. Of course I have my opinion of players and such, but we can't really call a class excellent or poor or whatever until the players see the field and produce or not produce. At the moment I would say this class has a few elite recruits (my personal opinion)...I would be very surprised if these guys don't turn into awesome players...Kraemer, McKinley, Claypool, Studstill, and Pride. Robertson would fit into this category as well. Next tier...most likely solid contributors and could turn into absolute studs, but have injury concerns or lack the upside of the first group...Eichenberg, Hayes, Kareem, Okwara. Next tier...The "Mesh Guys", without them the class wouldn't be the same, but they will most likely be delegated to simply normal starters or very good role players...Boudreaux, Vaughn, Elliott, Jones x2, Love. Everyone else... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golson5 176 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I usually try to wait at least 2 years before I truly judge a class. Of course I have my opinion of players and such, but we can't really call a class excellent or poor or whatever until the players see the field and produce or not produce. At the moment I would say this class has a few elite recruits (my personal opinion)...I would be very surprised if these guys don't turn into awesome players...Kraemer, McKinley, Claypool, Studstill, and Pride. Robertson would fit into this category as well. Next tier...most likely solid contributors and could turn into absolute studs, but have injury concerns or lack the upside of the first group...Eichenberg, Hayes, Kareem, Okwara. Next tier...The "Mesh Guys", without them the class wouldn't be the same, but they will most likely be delegated to simply normal starters or very good role players...Boudreaux, Vaughn, Elliott, Jones x2, Love. Everyone else... For the most part I agree with your entire post. The only player I think you're wrong on is Elliot.I think he had high upside high potential and could be in first tier And I'd put Stepherson on the third group Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LasVegasIrish 0 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 For the most part I agree with your entire post. The only player I think you're wrong on is Elliot.I think he had high upside high potential and could be in first tier And I'd put Stepherson on the third group I could see that. I know the staff really likes him. I was tempted to put Love there too. All I hear is great things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big23Head 2,431 Posted February 17, 2016 Author Share Posted February 17, 2016 <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Very excited to announce that I will be attending and playing football at Notre Dame next year! <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/GoIrish?src=hash">#GoIrish</a> <a href="https://t.co/0stX1ngf30">pic.twitter.com/0stX1ngf30</a></p>— Arion Shinaver (@Ashiv_21) <a href=" ">February 16, 2016</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.